Новая версия сайта Перейти
Russian (CIS)English (United Kingdom)
ISSN 2223-165X

V.I. ABAEV NORTH-OSSETIAN INSTITUTE FOR HUMANITARIAN AND SOCIAL STUDIES

OF VLADIKAVKAZ SCIENCE CENTRE OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE

AND THE GOVERNMENT OF NORTH OSSETIA-ALANIA

ИЗВЕСТИЯ СОИГСИ


Kudzoeva A.F., Kachmazova E.S., Shafaghi M. Comparative Analysis of Participles in Russian, Persian and Ossetian Languages Print

In linguistics the participle is commonly referred to a nonfinite form of the verb denoting the sign of a name, related to action and performs an attributive function. Thus, the participle combines the features of a verb and an adjective. “Verbal” nature of participial forms is confirmed by a set of characteristic features of the verb shared: categories of tense, of voice and of aspect. Such features of participle as category of gender (in some languages), singular and plural forms, category of case bring it closer to an adjective, as well as capability to function as an attribute and be part of a compound-nominal predicate. The dual nature of a participle gives ground to different opinions about its semantic and grammatical status. Though most of linguists in Russian studies, Ossetian studies and Iranian studies refer participle to verbal forms, there also exist differing opinions about its categorization. The choice of the theme of the articleis due, firstly, to the fact that participle is the least extensively described morphological form in all three languages (Persian, Russian and Ossetian); secondly, qualification and analysis of indicated morphological form in one (namely, Indo-European) language family is of scientific interest, as two of them Ossetian and Persian represent one linguistic group, thirdly, we have reason to believe that morphology of Ossetian, in particular, the category of a verb retained its original Indo-European features that comparative analysis of Ossetian participle with Russian and Persian confirms. The comparison of participles in these three languages gives us opportunities to identify less studied aspects of the verbal form and define the ways and methods of the further study.

Keywords: nonfinite verb form, Russian, Persian, Ossetian, passive participles, passive constructions, transposition of participles.

References:

1. Peshkovskiy A.M. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian syntax in scientific coverage]. Moscow, 1956. 511 p.

2. Vinogradov V.V. Russkii yazyk [Russian language]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1972. 601 p.

3. Shanskiy N.M., Tikhonov A.N. Sovremennyi russkii yazyk. V 3-h ch. [Modern Russian language. In 3 books]. Ch.2. Slovoobrazovanie. Morfologiya [Part 2. Derivation. Morphology]. Moscow, Prosveschenie, 1987. 256 p.

4. Bagaev N.K. Sovremennyi osetinskii yazyk. V 2-h ch. [Modern Ossetian language. In 2 parts]. Chast’ 1. Fonetika i morfologiya [Part 1. Phonetics and morphology]. Ordzhonikidze, North-Ossetian Book publishing house, 1969. 487 p.

5. Akhvlediani G.S (red.) Grammatika osetinskogo yazyka. V 2-h t. [Grammar of the Ossetic Language. In 2 vols]. T. 1. Fonetika i morfologiya [Vol. 1. Phonetics and morphology]. Ordzhonikidze, Sevosgiz, 1963. 368 p.

6. Kachmazova E.S. Prichastie kak dvuprirodnaya samostoyatel'naya chast' rechi: istoki i sovremennost' (na materiale form indoevropeyskogo, indoiranskogo, drevne-, sredne- inovoiranskih yazykov) [Participle as an independent part of speech: origin and modernity (on the material of forms of Indo-European , Indo-Iranian, ancient-, middle-, new Iranian languages]. Thesis abstract of the candidate dissertation (in Philology). Nalchik, 2006. 24 p.

7. Vydrin A.P. Glagol v osetinskom yazyke [Verb in Ossetian Language]. Vostokovedenie. Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniya. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik statei [Oriental Studies. Historical and Philological studies. Interuniversity collection of articles]. St. Petersburg, 2014, iss. 30, pp. 25-81.

8. Vakhidov A.A. Prichastiya v sovremennom persidskom yazyke [Participles in modern Persian language]. Thesis abstract of the candidate dissertation (in Philology). Moscow, 1990. 17 p.

9. Rubinchik Yu.A. Grammatika sovremennogo persidskogo literaturnogo yazyka [Grammar of modern Persian literary language]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura, 2001. 600 p.

10. Russkaya grammatika. V 2-h t. [Russian grammar. In 2 vols]. T. 1. Fonetika. Slovoobrazovanie. Morfologiya [Vol. 1. Phonetics. Derivation. Morphology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980. 789 p.

11. Takazov Kh.A. Kategoriya glagola v sovremennom osetinskom yazyke [Category of the verb in the modern Ossetian language]. Doctoral dissertation (in Philology). Moscow, 1992.

12. Tedeev G.Z. Semanticheskaya struktura osetinskogo glagola [Semantic structure of the Ossetian language]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba, 1989. 117 p.

13. Tekhov F.D. Vyrazhenie modal'nosti v osetinskom yazyke [Modality expression in the Ossetian language.]. Tbilisi, Mecniereba, 1970. 196 p.

14. Sattsaev E.B. Vremennye formy glagola v iranskih yazykah (osetinskom i persidskom [Temporary forms of verb in Iranian languages (Ossetian and Persian)]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern issues of science and education]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 358.

15. Novikov L.A (red). Sovremennyi russkii yazyk. Fonetika. Leksikologiya. Slovoobrazovanie. Sintaksis [Modern Russian language. Phonetics. Lexicology. Derivation. Syntax]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 2003. 864 p.