ИЗВЕСТИЯ СОИГСИ

Somatic lexicon is one of the universal lexical groups in any language. In view of this, this very group of words is one of the most common objects of comparative-historical, structural-comparative and linguocultural research. Both in Russian and foreign linguistic studies, as a rule, this vocabulary is distinguished first in the lexical-thematic system of any language. This article is devoted to the study of the somatic lexicon of the Digorian version of the Ossetian language, as this problem in the Ossetian linguistics has not been sufficiently studied. In the article the concept of somatic vocabulary is given, the place of somatic lexicon in the lexical system of language is analyzed. Different classifications of somatisms are considered. The most acceptable for the somatic lexicon of the Digor variant of the Ossetian language is a classification based on their functional characteristics and the nature of the object of nomination, as well as on the opposition “external / internal”. The study revealed the composition of the somatic lexicon of the Digor variant of the Ossetian language, which was analyzed and systematized. The semantic and denotative characteristics of Digor somatisms are given. It was revealed that the Digor somatisms are characterized by a complex system of figurative meanings and increased productivity in word formation and in the formation of idiomatic combinations.

Keywords: Digorian variant of the Ossetian language, vocabulary, word semantics, lexico-semantic system of language, somatisms.

References:

1.         Kostomarov P.I. Antropocentrizm kak vazhnejshij priznak sovremennoj lingvistiki [Anthropocentrism as the most important sign of modern linguistics]. Vestnik KemGU [Bulletin of Kemerov State University]. 2014, no. 2(58), pp. 198-203.

2.         Bogus Z.A. Somatizmy v raznosistemnyh yazykah: semantiko-slovoobrazovatel'nyj i lingvokul'turologicheskij aspekty (na materiale russkogo, adygejskogo i anglijskogo yazykov). [Somatisms in different-system languages: semantic-word-formation and linguocultural aspects (on the material of Russian, Adyghe and English languages)]. Thesis abstract of the candidate dissertation (in Philology). Maikop, 2006. 27 p.

3.         Gak V.G. Yazykovye preobrazovaniya [Language Conversions]. Moscow, School “Yazyki russkoj kultury” Publ., 1998. 768 p. 

4.         Vakk F. O. O somaticheskoj frazeologii v sovremennom ehstonskom literaturnom yazyke [On somatic phraseology in the modern Estonian literary language]. Thesis abstract of the candidate dissertation (in Philology). Tallinn, 1964. 28 p.

5. Veintraub P.M. Opyt sopostavleniya somaticheskoj frazeologii v slavyanskih yazykah [The experience of comparing somatic phraseology in the Slavic languages]. Voprosy frazeologii [Phraseology issues]. 1998, no. 3, pp. 157–162.

6. Vezhbickaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazykov [Semantic universalisms and description of languages]. Moscow, 1999. 780 p.

7. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of man]. Moscow, 1999. 896 p.

8. Dybo A.V. Semanticheskaya rekonstrukciya v altajskoj ehtimologii. Somaticheskie terminy (plechevoj poyas) [Semantic reconstruction in Altai etymology. Somatic terms (shoulder girdle)]. Moscow, 1995. 385 p.

9. Mugu R.YU. Polisemantizm somaticheskoj leksiki (na materiale russkogo i nemeckogo yazykov) [Polysemanticism of somatic vocabulary (by the Russian and German)]. Thesis abstract of the candidate dissertation (in Philology). Maikop, 2003. 24 p.

10. Kochevatkin A.M. Somaticheskaya leksika v dialektah ehrzyanskogo yazyka (lingvogeograficheskij analiz) [Somatic vocabulary in the dialects of the Erzya language (linguogeographical analysis)]. Candidate dissertation (in Philology). Saransk, 1999. 315 p.

Abaev V.I. Istoriko-jetimologicheskij slovar' osetinskogo jazyka [Historical and etymological dictionary of Ossetian language]. Moskow – Leningrad, 1958, vol. I; Leningrad, 1973, vol. II; Leningrad, 1979, vol. III; Leningrad, 1989, vol. IV.