|
Keywords: Ossetian language, vocabulary, semantics, verbal nomination, contextual semantics.
The article is devoted to the study of the mechanisms of contextual variation of the internal semantics of the word and the ways they are realized in the language. The linguistic status, grammatical differences and heterogeneity of the vocabulary of the Ossetian language require different methods and approaches to their study, guided by the understanding of these features, consideration of contextual semantics in these articles limited to verbal lexemes as one of the types of nominative units. Based on the analysis of simple and complex verbal formations, both outside and inside the context, their semantic potential and options for its full disclosure were identified. By the method of simultaneous analysis of the actual lexical and contextual semantics of verbal nominations, the mechanisms for the emergence of secondary semantic hues, the complete or partial change of the internal semantics are identified, and the most productive ways of implementing communicative tasks with their help are identified. The cognitive approach used in this study made it possible to determine that the most accessible and at the same time productive method is a special affixal word formation, in which the prefixal method prevails. In performing the basic word-building function, the prefixes in the Ossetian language can change the pragmatic orientation of the word, give the performed action additional connotative meanings and regulate its intensity and strength. In addition, with their help, the direction of the committed action is expressed in relation to the speaker, as well as the attitude and emotional evaluation of the speaker regarding this action, the most striking of which are cases of logical-semantic divergence of the root morpheme with the selected affix. As special forms of lexical formations, compound verb nominations are noted, the semantic part of which is formed by adding up two separate concepts, complicated by a special affixing design. Such verb formations are attributed by us as author’sexclusive formations with high degree of figurativeness and are identified as transpositional variants that are prone to changing linguistic status when moving from a lexical unit to a phraseological one and vice versa.
REFERENCES
1. Zolotova, G.A. Kommunikaivnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communication grammar of the Russian language] Moscow, 2004. 544 p.
2. Tuzlu (Garifullina), A.M. Leksiko-frazeologicheskie sredstva vyrazheniya emociy v turetskom yazyke [Lexical and phraseological means of expressing emotions in Turkish]. Filologiya i kul'tura [Philology and culture]. 2012, no. 3(29), pp. 73-77.
3. Kubryakova, E.S. Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke. Yazyk i porozhdenie rechi [The human factor in language. Language and speech generation].Moscow, Nauka, 1991. 238 p.
4. Gumboldt, V. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Selected works on Linguistics]. Moscow, Progress, 2010. 400 p.
5. Serdobintsev, N.Ya. Semanticheskaya struktura slova i ego konnotatsii [The semantic structure of a word and its connotations]. Teoriya slova i funktsionirovaniya slovarnyh edinic [Theory of a word and the functioning of vocabulary units]. Saratov, Saratov State Pedagogical Institute, 1981. 142 p.
6. Gridin, V.N. Semantika emotsional'no-ekspressivnykh sredstv yazyka [The semantics of emotionally expressive means of language]. Psikholingvisticheskie problemy semantiki [Psycholinguistic problems of semantics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983, pp. 113-119.
7. Vasilev, L.N. K voprosu ob ekspressivnosti i ekspressivnykh sredstvakh (na materiale slavyanskikh yazykov [On the question of expressiveness and expressive means (on the material of Slavic languages)]. Slavyanskiy filologicheskiy sbornik [Slavic philological collection]. Ufa, 1962, iss. 9, no. 3, pp. 110-115.
8. Kozhina, M.N. Stilistika russkogo yazyka [The stylistics of the Russian language]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1983. 223 p.
9. Sergeeva, L.A. Otsenochnoe znachenie i kategorizatsiya ocenochnoy semantiki: opyt interpretatsionnogo analiza [Estimated value and categorization of evaluative semantics: the experience of interpretational analysis]. Thesis abstract of the doctoral dissertation (in Philology). Ufa, 2004. 45 p.
10. Morgoeva, L.B. Sub"ektivnoe v yazyke i rechi: priroda, soderzhanie, vyrazhenie. [Subjective in language and speech: nature, content, expression]. Vladikavkaz, North Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies, 2008. 187 p.
11. Potebnya, A.A. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Theoretical poetics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1990. 344 p.
12. Shahovsky, V.I. Tipy znacheniy emotivnoy leksiki [Types of values of emotional vocabulary]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics]. 2004, no. 1, pp. 39-47.
13. Arnold, I.V. Interpretatsiya khudozhestvennogo teksta: tipy vydvizheniya i problema ekspressivnosti [Interpretation of the literary text: types of nomination and the problem of expressiveness]. Ekspressivnye sredstva angliyskogo yazyka [Expressive means of the English language]. Leningrad, A. Herzen Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute, 1975, pp. 11-20.
14. Teliya, V.N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul'turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul'tury”, 1996. 288 p.
15. Lukiyanova, N.A. Ekspressivnaya leksika razgovornogo upotrebleniya (Problemy semantiki) [Expressive vocabulary of spoken use. (Problems of semantics)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1986. 215 p.
16. Guillaume, G. Printsipy teoreticheskoy lingvistiki [Principles of theoretical linguistics]. Sbornik neizdannykh tekstov, podgotovlennyy pod rukovodstvom i predisloviem Roka Valena [Collection of unpublished texts, prepared under the guidance and with preface of Rok Valen. Transl. from French. Ed., afterword and comments by L.M. Skrelina]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004. 224 p.
17. Narty kaddzhytæ (Nartovskiye skazaniya) [Nart sagas. In 5 books]. Vladikavkaz, 2003-2011, books 1-5. (in Ossetian)
18. Guriev, T.A. (ed.) Osetinsko-russkiy slovar' [Ossetian-Russian dictionary] Vladikavkaz, Alaniya, 2004. 540 p.
19. Parsieva, L.K., Gatsalova, L.B. Bol'shoy russko-osetinskiy slovar' [Large Russian-Ossetian dictionary]. Vladikavkaz, North-Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies, 2011. 687 p.
20. Abaev, V.I. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar' osetinskogo yazyka [Historical and etymological dictionary of the Ossetian language]. Moscow–Leningrad, Academy of sciences of the USSR, 1958, vol. I. 655 p.
21. Dzodzikova, Z.B. Sovremennyy osetinskiy yazyk (fonetika, leksika i frazeologiya, slovoobrazovanie) [Modern Ossetian language (phonetics, vocabulary and phraseology, word formation)]. Vladikavkaz, North Ossetian State University, 2017. 160 p.
22. Vydrin, A.P. Glagol v osetinskom yazyke [Verb in Ossetian language]. Vostokovedenie. Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniya. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik statey [Oriental Studies. Historical and philological studies. Interuniversity collection of articles. Eds. A.K. Ogloblin, N.N. Telitsin]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University, 2014, iss. 30. 268 p.
23. Kudzoeva, A.F, Kachmazova, E.S., Shafagi, M. Sravnitel'no-sopostavitel'nyy analiz prichastiy v persidskom, russkom i osetinskom yazykah [Comparative analysis of participles in the Persian, Russian and Ossetian languages]. Izvestiya SOIGSI [Proceedings of the North Ossetian Institute for Humanitarian and Social Studies]. 2018, iss. 30(69), pp. 103-112.
24. Tsopanova, R.G., Kolieva I.N. Sovremennyy osetinskiy yazyk. Slovosochetanie i sintaksis prostogo predlozheniya [Modern Ossetian language. Phrase and syntax of simple sentence]. Vladikavkaz, North Ossetian State University, 2017. 220 p. |
